Sunday, May 20, 2012

Prosperity is Back...in Washington, DC


There is a fascinating, and somewhat depressing, article in this week’s Time Magazine (Bubble on the Potomac) about the economy in our nation’s capital, unemployment much lower than the national average and median income much higher.  Surrounding counties are among the richest in the USA, and this in spite of a District of Columbia poverty rate significantly higher than average.  In spite of Paul Krugman’s dour warnings, there is no evidence of austerity taking hold in the Capitol.

 We frequently hear that government employment is not growing, and that is true.  According to the article, it is about the same as in the 1960’s.  But outsourcing is the big thing, and there are, according to the article, two government paid contractor employees in the capitol for every government employee.  And, besides the contractors, there are entities such as USPS whose employees are no longer government employees but do work government employees used to do.  Also, in DC, there are the hoards of lobbyists and lawyers.  And a new class of interns, recent college graduates, arrives every summer, often to work for free, at their parents’ expense for a year or so before getting a paid job. 

I suppose outsourcing started with corporations, a popular strategy for keeping company headcount and benefits cost down and dealing with variable labor demands.  But, there is a cost in reduced loyalty and in generally higher compensation and management expense.  And while it is pretty easy to justify bringing in experts for a short-term project, the decision to bring in consultants is often counterproductive, their expert advice being heard but not followed.  These same problems exist, of course, with government contractors and consultants. 

The article includes several examples of conspicuous consumption by the mostly young professionals enjoying the rich and self indulgent life even as they promote environmentalism, green energy, Spartan diets, and exercise for the rest of the country.  The bottom line is that the lives these would be public servants are living are as different from those of the typical American family as from those of the military folks, and their contractors, risking their lives in the Middle East, and from those of the 15% or so, 20% in DC, living in poverty. 

Wealthy former Senator and Democrat Party presidential candidate John Edwards liked to argue during his presidential campaign that there are “two Americas,” the wealthy and the poor, the haves and the have-nots.  I’d rather argue that, if one wants to divide Americans into various “classes,” there are at least a dozen: The happy poor, the resentful poor, the career military, military recruits, the large mass of working families getting along just fine on limited but balanced budgets, the large mass of working families loaded with debt and crying for help, the very rich sports and entertainment figures living extravagant and hedonistic lives, the very rich sports and entertainment figures living modest lives and looking for ways to help others, the very rich working folks living extravagant and hedonistic lives, the very rich working folks living modest lives and looking for ways to help others, the comfortably retired, the uncomfortably retired, the sick and dying, and, in a class all by themselves, government employees and contractors in Washington DC.

One thing for sure is that any attempts to divide us all into one of two categories and make those our primary identities, haves and have-nots, rich and poor, minority and majority, 1% and 99%, labor and management, religious and non-religious, gay and straight, red and blue, conservative and liberal, urban and rural, college educated and not, professional and blue collar, even male and female, are counterproductive nonsense.  We are all individual children of God, whether we like it or not, and that is the controlling and common identity we all have to acknowledge in the end.

With current trends, for the foreseeable future, I think the most secure financial future belongs to those government employees and contractors in Washington DC, but I still think I’ll advise my grandchildren to follow some other path…if they ask.

5 comments:

  1. I agree......why should anyone be interested in working for their government. You just get a lot of critique based on BS. Most of the Federal workforce are dedicated highly educated professional folks who work in defense engineering, the FBI, the NIH, etc. for a lot less pay and benefits than they could get working for a big chemical company.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My apologies, Andy. I thoughtlessly hit a nerve by generalizing my frustration. Of course federal employees are just like the rest of us, highly diverse with all kinds of backgrounds and interests and personal goals and ambitions. And certainly most, even some of the elected ones, are hard working public servants. But it just seems to me that federal spending is out of control and much of that is caused by expanded reach into our personal lives and reflected in the size of the federal workforce, contractors and service providers included. Of course pay is high because qualifications are high and money is cheap and budgets are apparently non-existent.

      Delete
  2. Obviously your apology is accepted. I really don't think, however, that the budget deficits are primarily due to the size of the population of employees and direct contractors providing services on behaf of the government. The federal emplyee population is now on a three year pay freeze and their pension contribution has been tripled. The problem, I believe is the massive costs of Medicare and Medicade,and the recent Drug benefit. The baby boomer generation are moving on to the roles in droves. When the economy sputters into a recession, even if it's just due to the normal business cycle, it aggravates the problem as there are more folks who now qulify for entitilements.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I had a discussion yesterday with a retired "Food Stamp" administrator, a state employee who locally administered a federal program. He said that the primary beneficiaries of the Food Stamp program are not the recipients of the benefits, but the people like him who had good paying careers and have good retirements because of the program. I thought that was an interesting perspective.

      Delete
  3. He may be right or it may be just an invalid opinion. I also am troubled by some of the salaries and benefits by some local and state government employees. In my locale, some the salaries are fairly generous, with zero contributions to pensions,and zero to health benefits, especially middle management. But, that is another issue and although a problem, the salary difference is just a blip when considering the national deficit. It's the direct benefits that are growing significantly , and it doesn't help when your fighting two very expensive wars at the same time.

    Part of my issue is that the federal employee is nothing like the state or local employee. The educational distribution and qualification are striking, yet everyone is generalized together.

    ReplyDelete