Long term trends, noise removed or reduced, can be very
helpful in understanding what is really going on in our national economy. In the last post I discussed the link between private investment and GDP but wanted to elaborate a bit on
the long term GDP trend and the difficulty we face in reversing that trend.
The chart below is all computed from government data
published on the BEA NIPA website. I
started with GDP in current dollars and used the GDP deflator to convert those
numbers to constant 2005 dollars. Then I
divided the annual numbers by population, which is up about 75% since 1960, to
get annual GDP per capita in 2005 dollars.
Then I calculated the percent change for each year from the previous
year and, beginning in 1965, calculated the five year moving average of that
percent change. So, with much of the
year-to-year noise removed, each point in the graph represents an estimate of
the average real growth in GDP per capita for the current and previous four
years. It may still look noisy, but the
important long trends have begun to emerge visually. Click on it to read the fine print.
In a nutshell, here is an amateur economist’s take on the
economic history of the USA since 1950.
Prosperity reigned in the postwar years, driven by positive can-do
attitude and energy of the citizens after the WWII suffering and victory and
freeing of resources that had been consumed by the war effort. That came to an end with the excessive “guns
and butter” spending required by President Johnson’s Vietnam and poverty wars
and darkening of the national attitude.
Nixon tried to put a damper on resulting inflation with
counter-productive price controls.
The
second major blow was the first big oil crisis in 1974 followed by rapidly
increasing energy prices, stagflation, the Iranian hostage crisis, and
President Carters donning of a sweater to keep warm while speaking to the
citizens on TV. Reagan’s tax cuts and
positive mental attitude and optimism turned things around in the 1980’s but
federal spending continued out of control, and the Reagan revolution was
largely undone in an ill-advised attempt to get the deficit under control with
tax increases rather than with spending cuts.
False signs of life appeared in the late 1990’s as the Dot Com bubble
pushed technology stock prices to absurd levels before the pop in early 2000.
The Bush administration, failing to recognize
that the current government surpluses were not going to continue indefinitely,
whacked tax rates, launched two wars on credit, and even joined the liberals with
an unfunded Medicare drug plan. Once
again false signs of life appeared in the form of a government induced real
estate bubble which popped in 2007-2008.
Since then we have been in a kind of organ donation program, trying to
spread the residual wealth around instead of focusing on getting the economy
humming again.
The exit from our current malaise, as described in the
previous post, will not be found in Washington DC except to the extent that our
leaders there recognize that serious private-investment-invigorating tax reform,
resulting in GDP growth, corporate and personal earnings growth, and tax
revenue growth, is the only way out.
Until they garner the courage to deal with that issue in a non-partisan
manner, the exit remains blocked with no way out.
Well, there is that emergency exit, accelerated inflation,
where many will be crushed and killed, economically, as they try to escape, and
which will lead only to the end of the USA as a free world power.
By the way, the major highly visible and disturbing symptom leading to this kind of diagnostic investigation is national debt as a percent of GDP, sort of like blood pressure or cholesterol levels for personal health. Here is the long term trend, over the same time frame as in the chart above, for that key variable. Some inverse proportionality seems to be evident.
By the way, the major highly visible and disturbing symptom leading to this kind of diagnostic investigation is national debt as a percent of GDP, sort of like blood pressure or cholesterol levels for personal health. Here is the long term trend, over the same time frame as in the chart above, for that key variable. Some inverse proportionality seems to be evident.
There is a nice opinion piece by Business Roundtable President John Engler in today's WSJ on how to change the corporate tax structure to force this exit open a bit: Corporate Taxes, The Myths and Facts



Maybe I failed to clearly make the point that this economic stagnation is what is stoking the flames of the current class war, less opportunity at the lower end of the economic ladder and more caution and defensiveness at the higher end combined with continued population growth, mostly at the lower end.
ReplyDeleteRomney, if he wins has real challenges ahead, meeting with Nancy Pelosi every Monday for constructive conversation will be big challenge. Perhaps, Obama might try a similar strategy. Either one will need to have lots of prayers.
DeleteTough way to start the week for sure...in either case.
DeleteVery interesting numbers. It also shows that politicians (no matter which flavor) don't really understand economics nor how their misguided attempts to "solve the problem" often make things worse. I firmly believe that everything is interconnected, like a spider web. Pull a string on one side and everything it touches gets moved!
ReplyDeleteYou'd make a good student of System Dynamics. Unfortunately, short term thinking tends to dominate, in government and business and personal planning, and most of those interactions are longer term effects. That is why I had to use the five year moving average to filter out the short term effects. Thanks, for the comment.
DeleteDarryl